10 points | by pseudolus 21 hours ago ago
6 comments
> small animals in the street in the dark
Not exactly Waymo's fault this one, is it?
It may depend on if the vehicle opted to avoid hitting the cat, when most human drivers would have.
> The Waymo did not even slow down, swerve or attempt to avoid the cat, the complaint said.
I suspect Waymo can provide better incident data than humans would and I'll give them a point for that.
I think this ambiguity nicely highlights why the New York Post is a horrific source of news and raw information.
Shallow reporting, limited facts, clickbait, article is not worth putting into my brain.
Their automated product killed a living creature. Yes, it is by definition their fault.
Can you elaborate?
> small animals in the street in the dark
Not exactly Waymo's fault this one, is it?
It may depend on if the vehicle opted to avoid hitting the cat, when most human drivers would have.
> The Waymo did not even slow down, swerve or attempt to avoid the cat, the complaint said.
I suspect Waymo can provide better incident data than humans would and I'll give them a point for that.
I think this ambiguity nicely highlights why the New York Post is a horrific source of news and raw information.
Shallow reporting, limited facts, clickbait, article is not worth putting into my brain.
Their automated product killed a living creature. Yes, it is by definition their fault.
Can you elaborate?