I spent some time on Friday trying out Cloudflare tunnel and boy was it a bad experience. The big killer was that the tunnel endpoint they gave me had an IPv6-only endpoint that I'm not sure was even valid. None of my devices could connect to it, including macbook, phone, linux, AWS instance...
On top of that I keep running into unexpected roadblocks with Cloudflare, like when I was trying to set up the tunnel they required me to set up a dedicated domain, you can't set up a subdomain of an existing domain. Probably fine if you are rolling it out as a production service, but for just testing it to make sure it even works (see IPv6 comments above), I just wanted to set it up as a subdomain.
Works great for me, 5 subdomains coming to various ports on my dev pc for whatever project I'm testing (8000 for laravel, 3000 for nextjs). Way better than ngrok.
I'm very surprised to see all of the negativity toward Cloudflare's usability and value here.
It's been relatively painless for me to set up tunnels secured by SSO to expose dashboards and other internal tools across my distributed team using the free plan. Yes, I need to get a little creative with my DNS records (to avoid nested subdomain restrictions), but this is not really much of a nuisance given all of the value they're giving me for free.
And after paying just a little bit ($10-20 per month), I'm getting geo-based routing through their load balancers to ensure that customers are getting the fastest connection to my infra. All with built-in failover in case a region goes down.
> I'm very surprised to see all of the negativity toward Cloudflare's usability and value here.
As someone who uses Cloudflare at a professional level, I don't. To me each and every single service provided by Cloudflare feels somewhere between not ready for production or lacking any semblance of a product manager. Everything feels unreliable and brittle. Even the portal. I understand they are rushing to release a bunch of offerings, but this rush does surface in their offerings.
One of my pet peeves is Cloudflare's Cache API in Cloudflare Workers, and how Cloudflare's sanctioned approach to cache POST requests is to play tricks with the request, such as manipulate HTTP verb, URL, and headers, until it somehow works. It's ass-backwards. They own the caching infrastructure, they own the js runtime, they designed and are responsible for the DX, but all they choose to offer is a kludge.
Also, Cloudflare Workers are somehow deemed as customizable request pipelines, but other Cloudflare products such as Cloudflare Images service can't be used with Workers as it fails to support forwarding standard request headers.
I could go on and on, but ranting won't improve anything.
Post requests aren't really meant for repeatable stuff though. Even browsers will ask for confirmation before letting you reload the result of a post request. I think you are holding it wrong.
Now I get it things happen and you gotta do what you gotta do but then you aren't on the happy path anymore and you can't have the same expectations.
> Post requests aren't really meant for repeatable stuff though.
That's simply wrong. Things like GraphQL beg to differ. Anyone can scream this until they are red in the face but the need to cache responses from non-GET requests is pervasive. I mean, if it wasn't then why do you think Cloudflare recommends hacks to get around them?
Your blend of argument might have had a theoretical leg to stand on if Cloudflare didn't went out of it's way to put together official examples on how to cache POST requests.
The Cache API is a web-standard API. We chose to follow it in an attempt to follow standards. Unfortunately it turned out to be a poor fit. Among other things, as you note, the "cache key" is required to be HTTP-request-shaped, but must be a GET request, so to cache the result of a POST request you have to create a fake GET request that encodes the unique cache key in the URL. The keys should have just been strings computed by the app all along, but that's not what the standard says.
We'll likely replace it at some point with a non-standard API that works better. People will then accuse us of trying to create lock-in. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
> The Cache API is a web-standard API. We chose to follow it in an attempt to follow standards.
That's perfectly fine, but it doesn't justify the lack of support for non-GET requests though. The Cache API represents the interface but you dictate what you choose how to implement it. In fact, Cloudflare's cache API docs feature some remarks on how Cloudflare chose to implement some details a certain way and chose to not implement at all some parts of Cache API.
If Cloudflare's Cache API implementation suddenly supported POST requests, the only observable behavior change would be that cache.put() would no longer throw an error for requests other than GET. This is hardly an unacceptable change.
We can't implement automatic caching of POST requests because there is no standard for computing cache keys for POST requests; it's different for every application.
E.g. presumably the body of the request matters for cache matching, but the body can be any arbitrary format the application chooses. The platform has no idea how to normalize it to compute a consistent cache key -- except perhaps to match the whole body byte-for-byte, but for many apps that would not produce the desired behavior. For example, if you had a trace ID in your requests, now none of your requests would hit cache because each one has a unique trace ID, but of course a trace ID is not intended to be considered for caching.
The Cache API can only implement the semantics that the HTTP standard specifies for caching, and the HTTP standard does not specify any semantics for caching POST requests.
That said, what we really should have done was left it up to the application to compute cache keys however they want, and only implemented the lookup from string cache key -> Response object. That's not what the standard says, though.
Cloudflare’s whole admin console is rather incoherent. The tunnel configuration makes very little sense unless you understand the product in quite a bit of detail, and the docs don’t help. And sites, tunnels, DNS config and such are entangled in bizarre ways. Oh, and there’s console zero and one, and they seem to reroute to each other basically arbitrarily :(
It would be awesome if there was a way to view the console that actually reflected how a request routed through the system.
I really wanted to love Cloudflare, even invested in it a couple years ago I was so confident in their vision. But...
- They won't tell you at what point you will outgrow their $200/mo plan and have to buy their $5K+/mo plan. I've asked their support and they say "it almost never happens", but they won't say "It will never happen." HN comment threads are full of people saying they were unexpectedly called by sales saying they needed to go Enterprise.
- There are no logs available (or at least weren't 6-9 months ago) for the service I proxy through Cloudflare at the $200/mo level, you have to go with Enterprise ($5K+ I've been told) to get logs of connections.
- I set up some test certs when I was migrating, and AFAICT there is no way to remove them now. It's been a year, my "Edge Certificates" page has 2 active certs and 6 "Timed Out Validation" certs, I can't find a way to remove them.
- The tunnel issue I had on Friday trying to set up where my tunnel, more details in another comment here but apparently the endpoint they gave me was IPv6 only and not accepting traffic.
- Inability to set up a tunnel, even to test, on a subdomain. You have to dedicate a domain to it, for no good reason that I can tell.
It was a smooth experience for me. Just start the cloudflared container with the provided key in the environment and you are done.
I also don't have ipv6 but it is not required and if I remember correctly I did not have to specify any endpoints, just the key.
That really sums up the cloudflare experience and this is from someone heavily invested in their workers platform. They have lots of products and keep pumping more but except for DNS, most of them are half assed with weak maintenance/support.
That's not a fair take. I will give Cloudflare a lot of shit for some of their products, but some of their products are 100% best in class. For instance, R2 is just better than S3, and KV is better than AWS/GCP options. The pricing is better, it's multi-region by default and there's less ops overhead.
R2’s writes are much slower than S3/GCS. It’s not a good fit unless your workload does many reads for each write (e.g. assets). Also it is notably not multi-region - it just picks a region automatically based on where you created the bucket from.
KV is super expensive - once you’re operating at non-trivial scale, reading another configuration value per-request in your worker starts to cost thousands per month. KV’s tail latencies are also surprisingly bad (I’ve seen over a minute), even for frequently read keys that should be easily cached.
This is good to know. I haven't used R2, it's been on my radar but I haven't taken the steps to start using it. Partly because my experience with the rest of Cloudflare has been middling to poor. I'd love to save on our S3 bill, which is substantial, but it's going to take significant development to get there and it's an unknown how much it'll actually save. There are too many stories of people getting called by enterprise sales when their usage crosses some line in the sand that only the sales people know.
I agree with R2 but KV is un-realiable. I said DNS but I meant CDN which R2 kind of falls into. Cloudflare is good in moving lots of data but most of their other products are not polished. It doesn't mean that they are not exceptional products. I have deployed a wasm-worker 5 years ago and it is still up and running to this day. I don't think a server would have survived or any other product from any other provider would have guaranteed such backward compatibility.
Where are you seeing orders of magnitude lower R2 bills? The storage price for S3 is $0.023 per GB, and the price for CF is $0.015 per GB. The operation pricing is even more similar - S3 is $5/million writes and $0.40/million reads, while Cloudflare is $4.50/million writes and $0.36/million reads.
We're using Cloudflare Zero Trust quite extensively, and I find them quite easy to use. Works perfectly from AWS as well, all their endpoints have both IPv4 and IPv6 IPs.
Maybe the tunnel they provisioned for me was just broken, because:
$ host -t A 9c8855f1-e47f-47bf-9e0e-66938be0f076.cfargotunnel.com
9c8855f1-e47f-47bf-9e0e-66938be0f076.cfargotunnel.com has no A record
$ host -t AAAA 9c8855f1-e47f-47bf-9e0e-66938be0f076.cfargotunnel.com
9c8855f1-e47f-47bf-9e0e-66938be0f076.cfargotunnel.com has IPv6 address fd10:aec2:5dae::
$ telnet -6 9c8855f1-e47f-47bf-9e0e-66938be0f076.cfargotunnel.com 443
Trying fd10:aec2:5dae::...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection timed out
I got the cloudflared running fairly easily (though their Debian package repo seemed broken and they didn't have an option listed on the setup page for downloading just the binary, I was able to find it after some searching). That part went smoothly, I just couldn't connect to the tunnel they provisioned.
It’s confusing, but those tunnels are not designed to be used directly - you’re supposed to use them as an origin in a DNS record or hit them from a worker. The IPv6 address you’re getting there is actually a private (ULA) address and will not be reachable via the internet. I’m not sure why they return it at all.
I'd tend to agree with that, but I was able to find some youtube videos of people setting them up. It was still a little bit of a challenge though because they have moved the menus all around in the last few months, so even the most recent videos I could fine were pointing to locations that didn't exist and I had to go hunting for them.
I would have preferred to just use tailscale for this, but we are using headscale and want to make a service available to our sister company, that doesn't have e-mails in our Google Workgroup where we have the OIDC for auth, so they can't be part of our tailnet without buying them logins or setting up accounts in keycloak or similar.
Haven't used Cloudflare in a while, but in the past you needed $200/month Business plan to be able to use subdomains of an existing domain with DNS hosted elsewhere.
Nah, I'm free tier. I register domains through them and I think I pay around $10/month for R2 storage. All kinds of other freebies come on that tier, D1 databases (sqlite), Workers (think Lambda)
Tunneling isn't that big of a toll on resource, it doesn't require storage/disk space nor compute power (CPU chips), all it needs is ingress/egress (spare bandwidth). A non-profit or decent business in telco can easily offer it, consider that many hosting companies offer entire package in free tier today (compute + disk + egress).
For several years, ngrok was practically free, only recently they've started monetizing once it gained popularity.
We were also super frustrated with Cloudflare Tunnel, especially from a developer experience and firewall perspective. So we built Tunlr to replace it: https://tunlr.dev. It's Cloudflare Tunnels but you can self-host it and provide your own domains for your internal developers to use, and it proxies over HTTP/SSE which plays nicely with firewalls.
I use it with a separate docker compose project so everything lives inside that (with traefik) and it's been utterly bulletproof for years - took a little puzzling out to start with but otherwise no drama and lets me do foo-whatever.mydomain.co.uk and route publically which is fantastic for local dev stuff or where I want to test something on iphone/android easily or share it - keeps all that stuff out of my "stack" for dev projects which makes for a very fast spinup if I want to test something.
Although Oxy is a closed, internal project, seems like they released part of it under a BSD license. Not the networking part, but a Rust library to create "production-grade systems".
A proprietary project. I was surprised to realize how little interest I have in these things anymore. I mean genuinely surprised. I suppose I have just seen so many large-corporation-does-something in isolation projects that I make two possibly wrong assumptions.
1) It will never work
2) The article is just advertising. Jobs, products whatever.
There is a third conclusion which is worrisome. That the leadership of the organization just doesn't get it.
I'm not advocating these as correct, just wondering if other readers share my instantaneous reaction of been-there, seen-that, know-how-it-ends.
Outside of HPC/HFT most people will never need kernel bypass. If you just got off Nginx you probably have years of optimizations left to do. (Username checks out though.)
They also could forget about it. I bet I've probably seen Oxy in some cloudflare post from years ago (maybe even from a launch week or something) but it never resonated.
But I might have encountered this problem or am about to, and such a post might resonate more.
It is like advertising in a way. But for knowledge. As long as people upvote it, it's resonating.
Isn't this the point of upvoting though - if people find it interesting and new, they will upvote and stuff will be visible.
I also think HN does some sort of deduplication if something has been posted recently (to count as upvote instead of new submission), but not sure of the details.
It's also the point of commenting. I think they were hoping for a more specific explanation along the lines of "I'm interested in it because it has X, Y, Z implications" or "Oxy continues to be important because ____ and here's the best comprehensive intro to it."
I think it would be nice to have a Hacker Canon of stuff that's no longer news but still worth reading. Maybe the HN front page could have a few threads looking back 1/5/10/20 years where people could re-discuss things in a historical context.
> Although Pingora, another proxy server developed by us in Rust, shares some similarities with Oxy, it was intentionally designed as a separate proxy server with a different objective.
Oxy actually means sharp or acidic in greek. Oxygen was wrongly named like that (acid former) because it was thought to be the element to give acids their sourness but later many acids without oxygen were discovered. The key turned out to be hydrogen not oxygen
I meant the I have no interest in knowing anything about any company's internal tech stack and also no interest in tying my application to one company's internal stack. Much of it sounded like lock-in to me.
I know it because of movies and books... so can we trust a "next generation proxy framework" by people who don't go out, don't read and don't watch culture things? The name is similar in other languages too..
The implication of being too nerdy would be that they are extremely well-versed in fantasy, science fiction and/or anime as well as random niche topics. They would probably read or watch way more culture things than you or me, just the kind that deals with current societal issues by allegory and thus wouldn't use real-world street names for drugs
Not that I think that that's a fair conclusion to jump through. Occam's razor would prefer "they were probably vaguely aware and didn't care". Just like how Torvalds knowingly named git after a slang word for a stupid person
Yup, here I am on the other side of the world and that was the first thing it reminds me of. The link to Rust is... remote, and I have to think a lot :D
I spent some time on Friday trying out Cloudflare tunnel and boy was it a bad experience. The big killer was that the tunnel endpoint they gave me had an IPv6-only endpoint that I'm not sure was even valid. None of my devices could connect to it, including macbook, phone, linux, AWS instance...
On top of that I keep running into unexpected roadblocks with Cloudflare, like when I was trying to set up the tunnel they required me to set up a dedicated domain, you can't set up a subdomain of an existing domain. Probably fine if you are rolling it out as a production service, but for just testing it to make sure it even works (see IPv6 comments above), I just wanted to set it up as a subdomain.
Works great for me, 5 subdomains coming to various ports on my dev pc for whatever project I'm testing (8000 for laravel, 3000 for nextjs). Way better than ngrok.
I'm very surprised to see all of the negativity toward Cloudflare's usability and value here.
It's been relatively painless for me to set up tunnels secured by SSO to expose dashboards and other internal tools across my distributed team using the free plan. Yes, I need to get a little creative with my DNS records (to avoid nested subdomain restrictions), but this is not really much of a nuisance given all of the value they're giving me for free.
And after paying just a little bit ($10-20 per month), I'm getting geo-based routing through their load balancers to ensure that customers are getting the fastest connection to my infra. All with built-in failover in case a region goes down.
> I'm very surprised to see all of the negativity toward Cloudflare's usability and value here.
As someone who uses Cloudflare at a professional level, I don't. To me each and every single service provided by Cloudflare feels somewhere between not ready for production or lacking any semblance of a product manager. Everything feels unreliable and brittle. Even the portal. I understand they are rushing to release a bunch of offerings, but this rush does surface in their offerings.
One of my pet peeves is Cloudflare's Cache API in Cloudflare Workers, and how Cloudflare's sanctioned approach to cache POST requests is to play tricks with the request, such as manipulate HTTP verb, URL, and headers, until it somehow works. It's ass-backwards. They own the caching infrastructure, they own the js runtime, they designed and are responsible for the DX, but all they choose to offer is a kludge.
Also, Cloudflare Workers are somehow deemed as customizable request pipelines, but other Cloudflare products such as Cloudflare Images service can't be used with Workers as it fails to support forwarding standard request headers.
I could go on and on, but ranting won't improve anything.
Post requests aren't really meant for repeatable stuff though. Even browsers will ask for confirmation before letting you reload the result of a post request. I think you are holding it wrong.
Now I get it things happen and you gotta do what you gotta do but then you aren't on the happy path anymore and you can't have the same expectations.
> Post requests aren't really meant for repeatable stuff though.
That's simply wrong. Things like GraphQL beg to differ. Anyone can scream this until they are red in the face but the need to cache responses from non-GET requests is pervasive. I mean, if it wasn't then why do you think Cloudflare recommends hacks to get around them?
https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/examples/cache-pos...
Your blend of argument might have had a theoretical leg to stand on if Cloudflare didn't went out of it's way to put together official examples on how to cache POST requests.
The Cache API is a web-standard API. We chose to follow it in an attempt to follow standards. Unfortunately it turned out to be a poor fit. Among other things, as you note, the "cache key" is required to be HTTP-request-shaped, but must be a GET request, so to cache the result of a POST request you have to create a fake GET request that encodes the unique cache key in the URL. The keys should have just been strings computed by the app all along, but that's not what the standard says.
We'll likely replace it at some point with a non-standard API that works better. People will then accuse us of trying to create lock-in. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
> The Cache API is a web-standard API. We chose to follow it in an attempt to follow standards.
That's perfectly fine, but it doesn't justify the lack of support for non-GET requests though. The Cache API represents the interface but you dictate what you choose how to implement it. In fact, Cloudflare's cache API docs feature some remarks on how Cloudflare chose to implement some details a certain way and chose to not implement at all some parts of Cache API.
https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/runtime-apis/cache...
Also, the Cache API specification doesn't exclude support for non-GET requests.
https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/#cache-put
If Cloudflare's Cache API implementation suddenly supported POST requests, the only observable behavior change would be that cache.put() would no longer throw an error for requests other than GET. This is hardly an unacceptable change.
We can't implement automatic caching of POST requests because there is no standard for computing cache keys for POST requests; it's different for every application.
E.g. presumably the body of the request matters for cache matching, but the body can be any arbitrary format the application chooses. The platform has no idea how to normalize it to compute a consistent cache key -- except perhaps to match the whole body byte-for-byte, but for many apps that would not produce the desired behavior. For example, if you had a trace ID in your requests, now none of your requests would hit cache because each one has a unique trace ID, but of course a trace ID is not intended to be considered for caching.
The Cache API can only implement the semantics that the HTTP standard specifies for caching, and the HTTP standard does not specify any semantics for caching POST requests.
That said, what we really should have done was left it up to the application to compute cache keys however they want, and only implemented the lookup from string cache key -> Response object. That's not what the standard says, though.
Cloudflare’s whole admin console is rather incoherent. The tunnel configuration makes very little sense unless you understand the product in quite a bit of detail, and the docs don’t help. And sites, tunnels, DNS config and such are entangled in bizarre ways. Oh, and there’s console zero and one, and they seem to reroute to each other basically arbitrarily :(
It would be awesome if there was a way to view the console that actually reflected how a request routed through the system.
I really wanted to love Cloudflare, even invested in it a couple years ago I was so confident in their vision. But...
- They won't tell you at what point you will outgrow their $200/mo plan and have to buy their $5K+/mo plan. I've asked their support and they say "it almost never happens", but they won't say "It will never happen." HN comment threads are full of people saying they were unexpectedly called by sales saying they needed to go Enterprise.
- There are no logs available (or at least weren't 6-9 months ago) for the service I proxy through Cloudflare at the $200/mo level, you have to go with Enterprise ($5K+ I've been told) to get logs of connections.
- I set up some test certs when I was migrating, and AFAICT there is no way to remove them now. It's been a year, my "Edge Certificates" page has 2 active certs and 6 "Timed Out Validation" certs, I can't find a way to remove them.
- The tunnel issue I had on Friday trying to set up where my tunnel, more details in another comment here but apparently the endpoint they gave me was IPv6 only and not accepting traffic.
- Inability to set up a tunnel, even to test, on a subdomain. You have to dedicate a domain to it, for no good reason that I can tell.
It was a smooth experience for me. Just start the cloudflared container with the provided key in the environment and you are done. I also don't have ipv6 but it is not required and if I remember correctly I did not have to specify any endpoints, just the key.
That really sums up the cloudflare experience and this is from someone heavily invested in their workers platform. They have lots of products and keep pumping more but except for DNS, most of them are half assed with weak maintenance/support.
That's not a fair take. I will give Cloudflare a lot of shit for some of their products, but some of their products are 100% best in class. For instance, R2 is just better than S3, and KV is better than AWS/GCP options. The pricing is better, it's multi-region by default and there's less ops overhead.
R2’s writes are much slower than S3/GCS. It’s not a good fit unless your workload does many reads for each write (e.g. assets). Also it is notably not multi-region - it just picks a region automatically based on where you created the bucket from.
KV is super expensive - once you’re operating at non-trivial scale, reading another configuration value per-request in your worker starts to cost thousands per month. KV’s tail latencies are also surprisingly bad (I’ve seen over a minute), even for frequently read keys that should be easily cached.
This is good to know. I haven't used R2, it's been on my radar but I haven't taken the steps to start using it. Partly because my experience with the rest of Cloudflare has been middling to poor. I'd love to save on our S3 bill, which is substantial, but it's going to take significant development to get there and it's an unknown how much it'll actually save. There are too many stories of people getting called by enterprise sales when their usage crosses some line in the sand that only the sales people know.
I agree with R2 but KV is un-realiable. I said DNS but I meant CDN which R2 kind of falls into. Cloudflare is good in moving lots of data but most of their other products are not polished. It doesn't mean that they are not exceptional products. I have deployed a wasm-worker 5 years ago and it is still up and running to this day. I don't think a server would have survived or any other product from any other provider would have guaranteed such backward compatibility.
R2 is very high latency with huge variance, definitely lower quality than S3.
In my experience even backblaze b2 performs (way) better.
Their community forums are full of such reports.
KV is so expensive that it’s barely usable, and like R2, is very slow.
Slightly higher latency. I've seen about 20-30% increase from S3 to R2. But the bill is magnitudes lower.
Agree with the KV point, Upstash is the same. But I just use dragonflydb on a single VM. No point paying for transactions.
Hell, S3 could have 20ms latency and it wouldn't matter since I can't afford it.
Where are you seeing orders of magnitude lower R2 bills? The storage price for S3 is $0.023 per GB, and the price for CF is $0.015 per GB. The operation pricing is even more similar - S3 is $5/million writes and $0.40/million reads, while Cloudflare is $4.50/million writes and $0.36/million reads.
Egress fees are the largest part of many AWS bills, this is by design, that price is deceptive. R2 has no egress fees.
I literally know an engineer that works on the storage layer for R2 and even he wouldn’t agree that it is better than S3
He wouldn’t disclose any details to me but from point of view S3 was best in class
We're using Cloudflare Zero Trust quite extensively, and I find them quite easy to use. Works perfectly from AWS as well, all their endpoints have both IPv4 and IPv6 IPs.
Maybe the tunnel they provisioned for me was just broken, because:
I got the cloudflared running fairly easily (though their Debian package repo seemed broken and they didn't have an option listed on the setup page for downloading just the binary, I was able to find it after some searching). That part went smoothly, I just couldn't connect to the tunnel they provisioned.It’s confusing, but those tunnels are not designed to be used directly - you’re supposed to use them as an origin in a DNS record or hit them from a worker. The IPv6 address you’re getting there is actually a private (ULA) address and will not be reachable via the internet. I’m not sure why they return it at all.
We spent 3 days trying to properly integrate their tunnels to our internal network. I took us 3 hours to integrate tailscale.
Tunnels are poorly documented.
>Tunnels are poorly documented.
I'd tend to agree with that, but I was able to find some youtube videos of people setting them up. It was still a little bit of a challenge though because they have moved the menus all around in the last few months, so even the most recent videos I could fine were pointing to locations that didn't exist and I had to go hunting for them.
I would have preferred to just use tailscale for this, but we are using headscale and want to make a service available to our sister company, that doesn't have e-mails in our Google Workgroup where we have the OIDC for auth, so they can't be part of our tailnet without buying them logins or setting up accounts in keycloak or similar.
> they can't be part of our tailnet without buying them logins
I'm pretty sure you can use Cloud Identity Free accounts to do this. I've done something similar with OIDC and it didn't cost anything.
Haven't used Cloudflare in a while, but in the past you needed $200/month Business plan to be able to use subdomains of an existing domain with DNS hosted elsewhere.
Nah, I'm free tier. I register domains through them and I think I pay around $10/month for R2 storage. All kinds of other freebies come on that tier, D1 databases (sqlite), Workers (think Lambda)
localtunnel[1] is one good option, at least for now.
[1] https://localtunnel.github.io/www/
I don't really get how the developer can run the project free of charge without monetization options. Does this solely rely on donors?
Tunneling isn't that big of a toll on resource, it doesn't require storage/disk space nor compute power (CPU chips), all it needs is ingress/egress (spare bandwidth). A non-profit or decent business in telco can easily offer it, consider that many hosting companies offer entire package in free tier today (compute + disk + egress).
For several years, ngrok was practically free, only recently they've started monetizing once it gained popularity.
Gotta say, this is amazing, exactly what I needed.
We were also super frustrated with Cloudflare Tunnel, especially from a developer experience and firewall perspective. So we built Tunlr to replace it: https://tunlr.dev. It's Cloudflare Tunnels but you can self-host it and provide your own domains for your internal developers to use, and it proxies over HTTP/SSE which plays nicely with firewalls.
Oh like Pangolin
I use it with a separate docker compose project so everything lives inside that (with traefik) and it's been utterly bulletproof for years - took a little puzzling out to start with but otherwise no drama and lets me do foo-whatever.mydomain.co.uk and route publically which is fantastic for local dev stuff or where I want to test something on iphone/android easily or share it - keeps all that stuff out of my "stack" for dev projects which makes for a very fast spinup if I want to test something.
Although Oxy is a closed, internal project, seems like they released part of it under a BSD license. Not the networking part, but a Rust library to create "production-grade systems".
https://github.com/cloudflare/foundations
A proprietary project. I was surprised to realize how little interest I have in these things anymore. I mean genuinely surprised. I suppose I have just seen so many large-corporation-does-something in isolation projects that I make two possibly wrong assumptions.
1) It will never work 2) The article is just advertising. Jobs, products whatever.
There is a third conclusion which is worrisome. That the leadership of the organization just doesn't get it.
I'm not advocating these as correct, just wondering if other readers share my instantaneous reaction of been-there, seen-that, know-how-it-ends.
Interesting. No mention of kernel bypass, which Cloudflare was also discussing in 2023-2024.
Outside of HPC/HFT most people will never need kernel bypass. If you just got off Nginx you probably have years of optimizations left to do. (Username checks out though.)
There should be a political party for people who use opcode mnemonics as their nicknames or domain names.
And another party for people who sign their emails with 3-letter usernames? :)
I'm ready to form a coalition.
So why is this surfacing again now and why not a up to date article on Oxy? Which sounds very useful btw.
There are always people who haven't heard about stuff. https://xkcd.com/1053/
They also could forget about it. I bet I've probably seen Oxy in some cloudflare post from years ago (maybe even from a launch week or something) but it never resonated.
But I might have encountered this problem or am about to, and such a post might resonate more.
It is like advertising in a way. But for knowledge. As long as people upvote it, it's resonating.
Surely you're not saying that everyone should just start posting all of cloudflare's blog posts? Let alone all blog posts on the net.
So, what's the threshold for what should be shared, given that most people don't know most thing things...?
Isn't this the point of upvoting though - if people find it interesting and new, they will upvote and stuff will be visible.
I also think HN does some sort of deduplication if something has been posted recently (to count as upvote instead of new submission), but not sure of the details.
It's also the point of commenting. I think they were hoping for a more specific explanation along the lines of "I'm interested in it because it has X, Y, Z implications" or "Oxy continues to be important because ____ and here's the best comprehensive intro to it."
People can submit anything they want. If it’s interesting, it’ll get upvoted. If not, it’ll not reach the front page.
Isn’t that the whole benefit of sites like HN and Reddit?
I think it would be nice to have a Hacker Canon of stuff that's no longer news but still worth reading. Maybe the HN front page could have a few threads looking back 1/5/10/20 years where people could re-discuss things in a historical context.
(2023)
Oxy sounds cool, but proprietary stuff is a hard pass for me. Just give me open-source any day.
How does it compare to Pangora?
The linked blog post has an entire section about that:
https://blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-oxy/#relation-to
> Although Pingora, another proxy server developed by us in Rust, shares some similarities with Oxy, it was intentionally designed as a separate proxy server with a different objective.
Is it the same thing? Perhaps oxy was later renamed to pingora?
Another un-google-able (OXY as in Occidental Petroleum Corp?) name for a Rust project. We just cannot help ourselves.
Look at the ADA language: GPS (GNAT Pro Studio) AWS (ADA Web Server) and ADA itself (American with disabilities act).
It would work better if more people and search engines understood that Ada (language) is not an acronym.
Now it's just a token.
The article states that it's a proprietary project
You google "Rust oxy proxy" and the first like 10 hits are Cloudflare's blog about it, a few HN posts.....
seems fine to me?
clever name
What does it mean ?
Oxy actually means sharp or acidic in greek. Oxygen was wrongly named like that (acid former) because it was thought to be the element to give acids their sourness but later many acids without oxygen were discovered. The key turned out to be hydrogen not oxygen
An informal nickname for the opioid Oxycodone
Or a reference to oxidation, the process by which rust is formed…
And also prOXY. Works in many levels.
Or simply oxygen.
or oxytocin
or oxymoron
that's funny :)
Stopped reading at proprietary. Seriously why would I care tying my app to something proprietary and have no way out of it?
What makes you think you can download it and use it yourself? This is just CloudFlare discussing their internal tech stack.
I meant the I have no interest in knowing anything about any company's internal tech stack and also no interest in tying my application to one company's internal stack. Much of it sounded like lock-in to me.
unfortunate name
Only in America
Unfortunately not (only)
Not only, but the opioid crisis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opioid_epidemic_in_the_United_..., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opioid_epidemic_in_the_United_...) is still something pretty specific to the United States, so you can't automatically assume that developers from other countries (I'm going by the author's name here because I wasn't able to find other information about him) will be familiar with the street names of various opioids...
They were too nerdy to think that way (or even know the street drug names).
I know it because of movies and books... so can we trust a "next generation proxy framework" by people who don't go out, don't read and don't watch culture things? The name is similar in other languages too..
The implication of being too nerdy would be that they are extremely well-versed in fantasy, science fiction and/or anime as well as random niche topics. They would probably read or watch way more culture things than you or me, just the kind that deals with current societal issues by allegory and thus wouldn't use real-world street names for drugs
Not that I think that that's a fair conclusion to jump through. Occam's razor would prefer "they were probably vaguely aware and didn't care". Just like how Torvalds knowingly named git after a slang word for a stupid person
Sure, those things are orthogonal to each other.
Yup, here I am on the other side of the world and that was the first thing it reminds me of. The link to Rust is... remote, and I have to think a lot :D
What does it mean ?
Short for oxycodone, a drug abused by addicts.
ah, the duality of man.