Oddly, The AI company doing the deals with the US military, and refusing to step over a line on the use of their tech, is the same company which just removed a key word from their mission statement, one which in some ways was a visible statement toward rejection of dangerous use of the tech, and so by removing it looks like a move toward what the military (or their leadership) want.
It's almost like an alternative history with google removing "don't be evil" at precisely the same time as being locked in a debate about .. how evil to be.
Oddly, The AI company doing the deals with the US military, and refusing to step over a line on the use of their tech, is the same company which just removed a key word from their mission statement, one which in some ways was a visible statement toward rejection of dangerous use of the tech, and so by removing it looks like a move toward what the military (or their leadership) want.
It's almost like an alternative history with google removing "don't be evil" at precisely the same time as being locked in a debate about .. how evil to be.