AT&T's gambit is to argue that the government owes them a jury trial, and to simultaneously ensure that a jury trial never happens [1]:
> You were to ignore that AT&T has been at the vanguard of making jury trials impossible for customers through its use of fine print forcing users to pursue binding arbitration, a lopsided system that finds in favor of corporations a vast majority of the time. Or that AT&T spends millions of dollars annually successfully lobotomizing the entirely of telecom oversight, be it congressional, legal or regulatory.
This is another Chief Justice Roberts feint, like striking down the Chevron deference, isn't it? That is, it's part of Roberts agenda to concentrate power in the Supreme Court.
AT&T's gambit is to argue that the government owes them a jury trial, and to simultaneously ensure that a jury trial never happens [1]:
> You were to ignore that AT&T has been at the vanguard of making jury trials impossible for customers through its use of fine print forcing users to pursue binding arbitration, a lopsided system that finds in favor of corporations a vast majority of the time. Or that AT&T spends millions of dollars annually successfully lobotomizing the entirely of telecom oversight, be it congressional, legal or regulatory.
[1] Wireless Giants To Get Off The Hook For Spying On Your Daily Movements For Years - https://www.techdirt.com/2026/04/23/wireless-giants-to-get-o...
This is another Chief Justice Roberts feint, like striking down the Chevron deference, isn't it? That is, it's part of Roberts agenda to concentrate power in the Supreme Court.