Claude Code and Codex are my daily drivers, and I often run them side by side on the same task to compare. For me Claude Code gets something working faster, but I burn the 5h quota on the $200 Max plan really fast. Codex I tend to trust a bit more on the careful diffs. The bigger change for me wasn't the tool though, it was writing a spec doc first (features/UX, technical, language-specific) before either agent touches code, then reviewing every diff. I still set up a lot of the harness by hand. How are people automating worktrees and parallel sessions?
Letta Code - It’s a much more coworker-like experience because it can learn, but also performs very well for coding, and the harness can be extended like pi
Claude Code and Codex are my daily drivers, and I often run them side by side on the same task to compare. For me Claude Code gets something working faster, but I burn the 5h quota on the $200 Max plan really fast. Codex I tend to trust a bit more on the careful diffs. The bigger change for me wasn't the tool though, it was writing a spec doc first (features/UX, technical, language-specific) before either agent touches code, then reviewing every diff. I still set up a lot of the harness by hand. How are people automating worktrees and parallel sessions?
Both CC (mostly pet projects and automation), and Cursor (mostly at work, because I still read the code, interact with python notebooks, etc.)
Letta Code - It’s a much more coworker-like experience because it can learn, but also performs very well for coding, and the harness can be extended like pi
(disclaimer: I work on Letta Code)
Doesn't the memory in letta become very expensive considering that LLMs are stateless (the context of the memory needs to be sent).
claude code mostly. run a clawmetry tab alongside so i can see what's actually happening across sessions, especially for longer tasks.
Used Antigravity, but now Claude Code
Aiden, Claude Code
pi.dev,I like minimalism