I do think, however, that holding out on it is a losing proposition. It's a very useful productivity tool if you know how to use it and those who don't will be left behind.
Yes.
That is what I usually do.
Like old days' unit test. Write a couple of units and test.
I never do plan first then let llm automatically code the entire project.
> Managers get aggregate level view of code quality
What's the measure of code quality in this case?
Agree, it is the most important part
- Am I the only guy in all of HN that doesnt use codex, doesnt use claude code, doesnt write code with agents?
All of HN? Surely not.
I do think, however, that holding out on it is a losing proposition. It's a very useful productivity tool if you know how to use it and those who don't will be left behind.
Yes. Look, how quickly I can click yes, Because I am a "Yes Oriented Programmer" after using Cluade code.
But honestly, it is extremely rare thing not using codex, or cluade code or any other agent.
i do use an LLM every now and then to write a function or two but i have stayed away from doing entire projects on full automation
Yes. That is what I usually do. Like old days' unit test. Write a couple of units and test. I never do plan first then let llm automatically code the entire project.
Does this work with codex too?
the teams product does, working on support for the cc-audit product!