> the whole “sham” disciplinary process was designed to censor his “protected conservative political speech”
I see he didn’t escape the conspiracy theories about “academic censorship”.
> He wants damages “without limitation” to cover his physical well-being, emotional state, reputation, “past and future economic losses,” and damage to career prospects.
Sounds like the epitome of entitlement.
And, of course, if the descriptions in the article are correct, he was not forthcoming. The confusion about “Word” denotes an uncanny lack of proficiency in tech for someone who, I assume, uses computers regularly.
Hand written exams under proctored conditions should be the norm.
Universities will be resistant to this for cost cutting, profit maximization reasons.
> the whole “sham” disciplinary process was designed to censor his “protected conservative political speech”
I see he didn’t escape the conspiracy theories about “academic censorship”.
> He wants damages “without limitation” to cover his physical well-being, emotional state, reputation, “past and future economic losses,” and damage to career prospects.
Sounds like the epitome of entitlement.
And, of course, if the descriptions in the article are correct, he was not forthcoming. The confusion about “Word” denotes an uncanny lack of proficiency in tech for someone who, I assume, uses computers regularly.