does the magnitude of doom matter? if humans or agents spread biological doom that kills 65% of humanity instead of resulting in global extinction, will pinker be pleased with these nuanced assertions? just so he can claim alarmism is a universally distorted and harmful take on reality?
does the magnitude of doom matter? if humans or agents spread biological doom that kills 65% of humanity instead of resulting in global extinction, will pinker be pleased with these nuanced assertions? just so he can claim alarmism is a universally distorted and harmful take on reality?