The only way out would be to either pass a law that makes chat control illegal (which is not going to happen) or for chat control to pass and be struck down by the courts.
The EU has decided to use 1984 as guide instead of a warning.
Between that and the Democracy shield which is basically state paid fact checkers fighting against supposedly foreign interference, can anyone say that the EU is still the best place regarding citizens privacy?
They will rebrand it and try again as many times as it takes until it passes once, thats how the EU works.
The only way out would be to either pass a law that makes chat control illegal (which is not going to happen) or for chat control to pass and be struck down by the courts.
Australia takes the censor everything approach, Europe takes the watch everything approach.
The EU has decided to use 1984 as guide instead of a warning.
Between that and the Democracy shield which is basically state paid fact checkers fighting against supposedly foreign interference, can anyone say that the EU is still the best place regarding citizens privacy?
The connection between fact checkers and privacy eludes me. Explain?